Statute provides that documents certified as business records are admissible, so circuit court erred in sustaining a hearsay objection against appellant\u2019s medical records. No offer of proof was necessary to preserve the issue because the certification specified the disputed evidence for the courts and the parties. But an offer of proof was necessary to demonstrate prejudice\u2014without the medical records, appellant cannot show that a $500 damages award was insufficient. No termination of the parties\u2019 lease occurred because appellant landlord did not give notice of termination to respondent tenant. When appellant instructed respondent to vacate, took possession, and re-let to a third party, respondents were liable only for the rents unmitigated by the third party\u2019s payments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Richard William Bangert, et al., Appellants, v. Dustin L. Rees, et al., Respondents.<\/em><\/a> Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District – ED109319<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Statute provides that documents certified as business records are admissible, so circuit court erred in sustaining a hearsay objection against appellant\u2019s medical records. No offer of proof was necessary to preserve the issue because the certification specified the disputed evidence … Continue reading
(Overview Summary)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n