Law Office of Camron Hoorfar, PC

This week, the CFPB banned private dispute resolution platform Ejudicate form arbitrating disputes about consumer financial products after the company misled student borrowers about its neutrality and initiated sham arbitration proceedings.

If you have any questions about student loans call the Law Office of Camron Hoorfar 816-944-0251.

On a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the movant had to show prejudice from counsel’s inadequate performance. Showing inadequate performance in failing to secure an expert required showing that an expert was available. The record showed that the trial counsel tried to, but could not, find an expert to support the movant’s theory of serotonin or medication intoxication as the cause of “numerous crimes arising out of sexual assaults of a minor.” The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of relief.
CHESTER WILLIAM FEWINS, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

When you need the best representation call the Law Office of Camron Hoorfar, 816-944-0251!

A felony assault in the first degree required knowing, substantial step toward a substantial risk of death or protracted loss or impairment of the body. The defendant’s conduct raised a presumption that the defendant intended the natural and probable consequences. The state showed that a taser can be lethal, especially when used without training, so a jury could find that a taser was a dangerous instrument. The defendant used the taser to cause the victim to lose control of the victim’s upper body in the course of attempting to escape custody. The victim was a corrections employee. The circuit court did not err in convicting the defendant of first-degree assault on a special victim and armed criminal action. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. MICHAEL RAY DURISON, Defendant-Appellant 

If you feel you have been wrongfully convicted of a crime, call us today 816-944-0251!

On a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, the movant needed to demonstrate that the counsel’s poor performance affected the outcome of the criminal trial, which involved deliberation. The movant claimed that counsel could have challenged this element by presenting evidence of a mental defect that compelled the movant to shoot a police officer, but this evidence was too vague and did not provide a reasonable likelihood of a different verdict given the strong evidence of guilt.

If you have been accused of a crime make sure you have the right attorney on your side, call the Law Office of Camron Hoorfar 816-944-0251.

Most taxpayers who requested an extension to file their 2023 Federal tax return MUST do so by October 15, 2024 to avoid a late filing penalty! Remember that an extension to file is NOT an extension to pay! If your tax preparer did not tell you that, save yourself the headache and have The Law Office of Camron Hoorfar file your 2024 tax returns! Give us a call at (816) 944-0251, we are here to help you with all of your federal and state tax needs!

On September 1, 2022, the Law Office of Camron Hoorfar, P.C. will be the Law Office of Tyler Gibson, P.C.  After fourteen (14) years in business, attorney Camron Hoorfar has sold a portion of his practice to attorney Tyler Gibson.  Attorney Tyler Gibson previously worked for the Law Office of Camron Hoorfar, P.C. for over six (6) years before opening his own law office.  On September 1, 2022, the Law Office of Camron Hoorfar, P.C. will no longer be assisting clients.  Moving forward, the Law Office of Tyler Gibson, P.C. will be able to assist you with your legal needs.  Attorney Tyler Gibson and his team will continue to provide the same great service that you previously received.

Camron would like to thank you for your continued loyalty and patronage over the years.  Camron has greatly valued the relationships that have been built over the past fourteen (14) years.  The Law Office of Camron Hoorfar, P.C. could not have been successful without your support. 

If you would like to contact Tyler, you may call him at 816-524-4949 or email him at Tyler@tgibsonlaw.com.  If you need to contact Camron, you may email him at Choorfar@Hoorfarlaw.com.

In an action for breach of contract, on a motion for summary judgment, defendant raised the affirmative defense that performance was impossible. That defense requires proof that defendant did “virtually” everything “within its powers to perform its duties under the contract.” The summary judgment record shows no such effort. “Defendants conflated performance pursuant to the Note (repayment of a loan) with running their business in order to repay the Note. The fact that it may have been impossible to operate a valet services business during the COVID-19 pandemic does not render it impossible to perform the terms of the Note.” Note and Guaranty provided attorney fees for enforcement, so the Court of Appeals remands the action to circuit court to determine the amount of the award. 
Premier Valet, LLC, Respondent, v. Premier Valet Services, LLC, and Brian Canavan, Appellants. 
(Overview Summary) 
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District – ED110242

Need to speak with an attorney? Call our office at 816-524-4949 or click here to schedule a consultation.