No Mandamus Against Referral to Arbitration

When a contract has an arbitration agreement, all disputed matters under the contract are presumptively subject to determination in arbitration, except a dispute as to whether a matter is subject to arbitration, which is presumptively subject to determination in circuit court. To show that a dispute as to whether a matter is subject to arbitration is presumptively subject to determination in arbitration requires clear and unmistakable evidence. Clear and unmistakable evidence appeared in a contract’s arbitration agreement, which incorporated by reference the rules of a professional association, which expressly provided that an arbiter shall determine the scope of the arbitrator’s own authority, including the “arbitrability of any claim [.]” An order granting arbitration is subject to review by writ of mandamus, not direct appeal. A challenge specific to that incorporation is necessary, in addition to any challenge against the contract as a whole or the arbitration agreement in particular, for relief from that provision.
STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. SETH SCHERMERHORN, Relator v. THE HONORABLE MICHAEL CORDONNIER, Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District – SD36747

Being sued? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

Action on Invoices Too Late

Statute of limitations for contract actions is five years, with exceptions that include any action for payment upon a written contract, which is ten years. Ten-year limitation could apply to an invoice stating that buyer’s signature constituted a promise to pay. But the ten-year limitation did not apply to seller’s invoices, on which buyer’s only writing was a signature, the significance of which the invoice does not describe. “[T]he promise to pay money must arise from the writing’s explicit language; extrinsic evidence cannot supply the promise.” Five-year limitation applied to the parties’ contract seller’s action to enforce that contract was too late, so circuit court should have dismissed that action, and the Supreme Court reverses the circuit court’s judgment.  
Di Gregorio Food Products, Inc., Respondent, vs. John Racanelli, d/b/a Racanelli’s Cucina Pizza Express, Racanelli’s Cucina, Racanelli’s Delmar, Racanelli’s Kirkwood, Racanelli’s Fenton, and Racanelli’s New York Pizzaria, Appellant.
(Overview Summary)
Supreme Court of Missouri – SC98443

 Being sued? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Wendy’s, Pizza Hut Franchisee NPC Looks to Sell Itself to Operator of Panera Stores

NPC International Inc., the nation’s largest franchisee of Wendy’s and Pizza Hut restaurants, has a deal to sell itself out of bankruptcy to Flynn Restaurant Group LLC. Flynn, the largest restaurant franchise operator in the U.S., is offering $816 million to buy the more than 1,300 restaurants operated by NPC. NPC filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in July and has been marketing assets. The stalking-horse offer could be subject to higher and better offers and requires bankruptcy court approval. It is likely to face competition from other interested buyers, including possibly Wendy’s Co. itself. Wendy’s said on Nov. 2 that it was considering making an offer for nearly 400 Wendy’s restaurants operated by NPC as part of a consortium with other Wendy’s franchises. Both Wendy’s and Pizza Hut LLC have expressed concerns about NPC’s quick timeline for a sale, and have pushed for greater involvement in vetting who will be the new owner of NPC’s restaurants. Wendy’s has signaled it would oppose a sale to Flynn, which operates Arby’s and Panera Bread restaurants that also sell sandwiches. Wendy’s has traditionally preferred franchisees that only own its restaurants, and Arby’s could be viewed as a direct competitor in the burger business. In addition to the Wendy’s restaurants, NPC operates roughly 900 Pizza Huts.

Struggling financially? Please contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

CFPB and New York Attorney General Take Action Against Debit-Collection Operation and Its Owners and Managers

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), in partnership with the New York Attorney General (NYAG), have filed suit against a network of five different companies based outside of Buffalo, New York, two of their owners, and two of their managers, for their participation in a debt-collection operation using illegal methods to collect debts. The company defendants are: JPL Recovery Solutions, LLC; Regency One Capital LLC; ROC Asset Solutions LLC, which does business as API Recovery Solutions; Check Security Associates LLC, which does business as Warner Location Services and Orchard Payment Processing Systems; and Keystone Recovery Group. The individual defendants are Christopher Di Re and Scott Croce, who have held ownership interests in some or all of the defendant companies, and Brian Koziel and Marc Gracie, who are members of Keystone Recovery Group, and have acted as managers of some or all of the defendant companies. The complaint alleges that the defendants have participated in a debt-collection operation that has used deceptive, harassing, and improper methods to induce consumers to make payments to them in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA). 

In a tight spot financially? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Las Vegas Monorail Files for Bankruptcy Again as Coronavirus Shuts Service

Las Vegas Monorail Co., a transit system financed with municipal debt that serves some of the city’s marquee hotels, filed for bankruptcy for the second time in just over a decade after the coronavirus pandemic shut down service. The nonprofit transit system is proposing a quick bankruptcy sale to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority for about $24 million. The bulk of the purchase price is held entirely by municipal-bond investor Preston Hollow Capital LLC.

Contemplating bankruptcy? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Damages Reduced Under MMPA

On remand, circuit judge need not make the same rulings as before remand. Plaintiff’s testimony, that plaintiff could not title her car because of defective title, did not constitute hearsay because it included only plaintiff’s first-hand experience and no out-of-court statement. Statutes provide that selling a motor vehicle without a valid title is fraud, so that conduct constitutes a violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, and supports plaintiff’s judgment. Actual damages included incidental damages, but loss of a business expectancy was beyond incidental damages. Statutes allow an award of punitive damages, which had support in evidence that motor vehicle dealer defendant sold plaintiff a motor vehicle with a manifestly defective title and, “when [plaintiff] attempted to work with the [defendant] to try to get a proper title and later attempted to rescind the purchase, the [defendant’s] employees laughed at her and taunted her to ‘take them to court.’” Statutes also allow an award of attorney fees, which Court of Appeals presumes is correct. Affirmed, with actual damage award reduced, and remanded again to determine the amount of attorney fees due on appeal.

Tequea Fisher vs. H & H Motor Group, LLC
(Overview Summary)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District – WD83318

Being sued? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.


Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

CFPB Settles with SMART Payment Plan, LLC for Deceptive Sales Practices

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a consent order against SMART Payment Plan, LLC, finding that the company’s disclosures of its loan payment program contained misleading statements in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010’s prohibition against deceptive acts or practices. SMART operates a loan payment program for auto loans called the SMART Plan that deducts payments from consumers’ bank accounts every two weeks and then forwards these payments every month to the consumers’ lenders. The consent order imposes a judgment against SMART requiring it to pay $7,500,000 in consumer redress and requirements to prevent future violations.  

In a tight spot financially? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

$128 Million Suit Against UnitedLex Over LeClairRyan Demise Shows Outsourcing No Cure for Dying Firm

As a growing number of law firms look to contract with third-party vendors to outsource business operations, a $128 million lawsuit filed by LeClairRyan’s bankruptcy trustee against UnitedLex makes it clear that the risks to both sides can be high. LeClairRyan’s trustee alleged that the terms of the deal with UnitedLex, which resulted in the creation of a joint venture to handle support services, served only to push the cash-strapped firm “further into insolvency.” Now UnitedLex itself faces substantial liability for allegedly sucking money out of the firm, at the expense of LeClairRyan’s other creditors. In June 2018, the two entities unveiled the launch of ULX Partners LLC, a joint venture that was intended to allow LeClairRyan and other law firms to outsource back-office operations and receive equity stakes in the new company. “If we don’t reach 10,000 employees in the next five years, then I’m not doing something right,” UnitedLex founder Dan Reed told The American Lawyer at the time. “Some people would view that as heretical, but it’s not.” But little over a year later, in August 2019, LeClairRyan announced its dissolution, following months of partner defections that had begun before the UnitedLex deal. The firm filed for bankruptcy five weeks later. And as its fate became increasingly apparent over the course of that summer, UnitedLex had nothing to say about the status of ULX.

Struggling financially? Please contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Iconic Restaurant Chain Friendly’s Files for Bankruptcy

Friendly’s Restaurants LLC, an iconic chain on the East Coast of the U.S. known for its sundaes, became the latest dining institution to go bankrupt amid the pandemic. The company filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware. It listed estimated liabilities of $50 million to $100 million, and estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million. FIC Restaurants Inc., which operates the Friendly’s brand, will sell almost all of its assets to Amici Partners Group. Nearly all of Friendly’s 130 corporate-owned and franchised restaurant locations are likely to remain open subject to pandemic limitations.

Contemplating bankruptcy? Contact our office at 816-524-4949 or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to schedule an appointment.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

CFPB Settles with Ninth Mortgage Company to Address Deceptive Loan Advertisements Sent to Servicemembers and Veterans

The CFPB issued a consent order against Low VA Rates LLC to address the Bureau’s finding that Low VA Rates sent consumers mailers for mortgage loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs that contained false, misleading, and inaccurate statements.  Low VA Rates’ conduct violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s prohibition against deceptive acts and practices, the Mortgage Acts and Practices – Advertising Rule, and Regulation Z. Low VA Rates, a Utah-based mortgage lender and broker incorporated in Colorado and licensed in 48 states and DC, advertised their loans through direct-mail primarily to U.S. military servicemembers and veterans. The consent order requires Low VA Rates to pay a penalty of $1,800,000 to the Bureau and imposes requirements to prevent future violations.

Are you a victim of a similar fraudulent matter? Contact our office at 816-524-4949, or you can visit our website at hoorfarlaw.com to see what our attorneys can assist you with.

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment